Welcome to POMInnO Services

1. Introduction to REACH: REACH is a key tool for chemical management in companies operating within the European Union. The introduction of this regulation aims to protect human health and the environment through better management of risks associated with chemicals (ECHA, 2020, Barlow et al., 2015; Fisk, 2013).
2. Benefits of Implementing REACH: REACH is a mechanism that not only helps companies comply with legal requirements but also offers long-term benefits such as improved workplace safety, health protection, and enhanced company reputation (Ciatti et al., 2021, Hammerschmidt & Marx, 2014, ECHA, 2016 ).
   • Improved Workplace Safety and Health Protection: There is broad consensus in the scientific literature that implementing REACH positively impacts workplace safety. Research shows that reducing exposure to harmful chemicals leads to fewer accidents and occupational diseases (Bodar et al., 2018; Frick, 2011, Wachter & Yorio, 2014, Godderis et al., 2024).
   • Compliance as a Risk Management Strategy: Compliance with REACH regulations is crucial to avoiding legal sanctions, as emphasized in scientific studies. This compliance is also seen as a strategic element of risk management in companies, which can lead to an increase in their market value (Ramos et al., 2020; Black & Baldwin, 2012, Vogel, 2010).
   • Increased Competitiveness and Sustainable Development: Implementing REACH can contribute to increased competitiveness by improving the company’s reputation for sustainable development. Studies suggest that companies adhering to REACH are perceived as more socially and environmentally responsible, which can attract new customers and partners (Hale et al., 2015; Kontogiannis et al., 2017, Worthington, 2013).
3. Challenges of Implementing REACH: While the benefits are usually highlighted, it’s also important to address the challenges associated with implementing REACH, which are discussed in the literature.
   • Implementation Costs: One of the main challenges is the high costs associated with implementing REACH, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Research indicates that these costs may include not only the registration of substances but also risk assessments and compliance monitoring (Salguero-Caparrós et al., 2020; Sutton, 2014).
   • Complexity and Bureaucracy: REACH is often criticized for its complexity and administrative demands. The process of registering and evaluating substances is time-consuming and requires significant resources, which can be challenging for SMEs (Li & Guldenmund, 2018; Robinson et al., 2020).
4. Recommendations: Given the challenges posed by implementing REACH, it is recommended to take steps such as identifying the chemicals used, conducting risk assessments, training employees, and regular monitoring (Pidgeon, 1991).
   • Importance of Training: Studies show that regular employee training in the safe handling of chemicals is crucial for the effective implementation of REACH. These training sessions should cover both theoretical and practical aspects to increase awareness and preparedness among employees (Gander et al., 2011; Walters et al., 2011).
   • Monitoring and Auditing: Regular monitoring of REACH compliance and conducting internal audits are essential to maintaining compliance and minimizing risk (Bahr, 2014; Reese, 2018).

Conclusion: The article rightly emphasizes that REACH is not just a legal obligation but also a tool for improving workplace safety and health protection within an enterprise. While implementing REACH comes with certain challenges, the long-term benefits, such as better employee health protection, compliance with regulations, and increased competitiveness, outweigh these difficulties. Therefore, it is worth investing in the REACH implementation process to ensure the safety and sustainable development of the company (Black, 2010; Majone, 2010).

Would You like to find out how our project can help You with REACH – fill in the form and we will contact You shortly: https://forms.gle/6YJgSAJiPpmSQbJW6

Bibliography (with links to original publications)

1. Bahr, N. J. (2014). System safety engineering and risk assessment: A practical approach. Available here.
2. Barlow, S. M., Boobis, A. R., Bridges, J., Cockburn, A., & others. (2015). The role of hazard-and risk-based approaches in ensuring food safety. Trends in Food Science & Technology, Volume 46, Issue 2, Part A, Pages 176-188 Available here.
3. Black, J. (2010). Risk-based regulation: Choices, practices, and lessons being learnt. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264082939-en .
4. Black, J., & Baldwin, R. (2012). When risk-based regulation aims low: Approaches and challenges. Regulation & Governance. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748- 5991.2011.01124.x.
5. Bodar, C., Spijker, J., Lijzen, J., & others. (2018). Risk management of hazardous substances in a circular economy. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.014 .
6. ECHA, 2016, Cost and benefit assessments in the REACH restriction dossiers https://doi.org/10.2823/57600
7. ECHA, (2020). REACH Regulation Overview. Helsinki: ECHA, https://echa.europa.eu/regulations/reach/understanding-reach
8. Fabrizzio Ciatti, Daniel Vencovsky, et al., 2021, Development of REACH – Review of evidence on the benefits & costs of REACH, German Environment Agency, https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/5750/publikationen/2021_01_28_texte_06-2021_reach_weiterentwicklung_ap_2.pdf
9. Fisk, P. (2013). Chemical risk assessment: A manual for REACH. Available here.
10. Frick, K. (2011). Worker influence on voluntary OHS management systems–A review of its ends and means. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.04.007
11. Gander, P., Hartley, L., Powell, D., Cabon, P., & others. (2011). Fatigue risk management: Organizational factors at the regulatory and industry/company level. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.007
12. Godderis L, et al., 2024, Towards a more effective REACH legislation in protecting human health. Toxicol Sci. 2024 May 28;199(2):194-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfae025.
13. Hale, A., Borys, D., & Adams, M. (2015). Safety regulation: The lessons of workplace safety rule management for managing the regulatory burden. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.012.
14. Hammerschmidt, T., Marx, R., 2014,  REACH and occupational health and safety. Environ Sci Eur 26, 6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-26-6
15. Kontogiannis, T., Leva, M. C., & Balfe, N. (2017). Total safety management: principles, processes, and methods. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.09.015.
16. Li, Y., & Guldenmund, F. W. (2018). Safety management systems: A broad overview of the literature. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.11.016.
17. Majone, G. (2010). Strategic issues in risk regulation and risk management. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264082939-en.
18. Pidgeon, N. F. (1991). Safety Culture and Risk Management in Organizations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22(1), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022191221009
19. Ramos, D., Afonso, P., & Rodrigues, M. A. (2020). Integrated management systems as a key facilitator of occupational health and safety risk management: A case study in a medium-sized waste management firm. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121346
20. Reese, C. D. (2018). Occupational health and safety management: A practical approach. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351228848 .
21. Robinson, C., Portier, C. J., & Čavoški, A., et al. (2020). Achieving a high level of protection from pesticides in Europe: Problems with the current risk assessment procedure and solutions. European Journal of Risk Regulation. 11(3):450-480. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.18.
22. Salguero-Caparrós, F., Pardo-Ferreira, M. C., & others. (2020). Management of legal compliance in occupational health and safety: A literature review. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.033.
23. Sutton, I. (2014). Process risk and reliability management. Available here.
24. Vogel, D. (2010). The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct. Business and Society, 49(1), 68-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309343407
25. Wachter, J. K., & Yorio, P. L. (2014). A system of safety management practices and worker engagement for reducing and preventing accidents: An empirical and theoretical investigation. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.029 .
26. Walters, D., Johnstone, R., Frick, K., Quinlan, M., & others. (2011). Regulating workplace risks: A comparative study of inspection regimes in times of change. Available here.
27. Worthington, I. (2013). Greening Business: Research, Theory, and Practice. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199535224, Available here.

#Safety #Management #REACH #fit4REACH2PL

In the ever-evolving landscape of sustainability, the circular economy stands out as a promising solution to many of our environmental challenges. By focusing on reducing waste and making the most of resources, the circular economy can significantly mitigate environmental degradation. However, implementing circular principles in food delivery presents unique challenges that require innovative solutions.

The Complexity of Food Delivery Systems

Food delivery systems are intricate networks involving multiple stakeholders, including suppliers, restaurants, delivery services, and consumers. Transitioning from a linear to a circular model in this sector is complex due to the diverse and interconnected nature of these systems. Each stakeholder has different priorities and capabilities, making it difficult to implement uniform circular practices.
For instance, while some restaurants might easily adopt reusable packaging, delivery services need to manage the logistics of returning these packages. This complexity necessitates a coordinated approach, where each stakeholder’s role and responsibilities are clearly defined and supported by robust infrastructure and policy frameworks.

Consumer Behavior and Mindset

One of the most significant challenges in promoting circularity in food delivery is changing consumer behavior and mindset. Many consumers are accustomed to the convenience of single-use packaging, which offers quick disposal without the need for cleaning or returning items. Shifting this mindset towards a more sustainable approach requires a cultural change, driven by awareness and incentives.
Educational campaigns highlighting the environmental impacts of single-use plastics and the benefits of reusable alternatives are essential. Moreover, providing incentives such as discounts for using reusable containers or penalties for opting for single-use items can nudge consumers towards more sustainable choices. However, these measures need to be carefully designed to avoid inconvenience that might discourage adoption.

Infrastructure and Logistics

The infrastructure required to support circular food delivery systems is another significant hurdle. Establishing a system where reusable packaging is collected, cleaned, and redistributed involves considerable logistical challenges. This requires investment in cleaning facilities, efficient collection routes, and partnerships with delivery companies.
Moreover, urban environments vary greatly in their capacity to support such systems. Cities with dense populations might find it easier to implement centralized cleaning facilities and efficient collection systems, while smaller or more spread-out areas may struggle with the logistics and cost-effectiveness of such solutions.

Regulatory and Policy Frameworks

Effective implementation of circular economy principles in food delivery also depends on supportive regulatory and policy frameworks. Governments play a crucial role in setting standards, providing incentives, and enforcing regulations that promote circular practices. However, developing and enforcing these policies can be challenging.
Regulations need to balance the interests of businesses and consumers while ensuring environmental benefits. Policies might include bans on single-use plastics, mandates for reusable packaging, and incentives for businesses that adopt circular practices. However, without proper enforcement and support, such policies might not achieve their intended impact.

Technological Innovation

Technological innovation is key to overcoming many of the challenges associated with circular food delivery systems. Advances in materials science can lead to the development of more durable and sustainable packaging options. Digital platforms can streamline the logistics of collecting and redistributing reusable containers, making the process more efficient and user-friendly.
However, adopting new technologies requires investment and willingness to experiment. Small businesses, in particular, may find it difficult to allocate resources towards such innovations without support from larger companies or government initiatives.

Economic Viability

The economic viability of circular food delivery systems is a critical consideration. While the long-term benefits of circularity include reduced waste management costs and environmental impact, the initial investment can be high. Businesses need to see a clear economic benefit to invest in reusable packaging systems, infrastructure, and technology.
Creating a business model that balances environmental sustainability with economic viability is essential. This might involve collaborative approaches where costs and benefits are shared among stakeholders, government subsidies or incentives, and innovative pricing strategies that reflect the true cost of single-use versus reusable packaging.

Conclusion

The transition to a circular economy in food delivery presents numerous challenges, from changing consumer behavior and developing infrastructure to creating supportive regulatory frameworks and ensuring economic viability. However, these challenges are not insurmountable. With coordinated efforts from all stakeholders, technological innovation, and supportive policies, the food delivery sector can move towards a more sustainable and circular model.
By addressing these challenges head-on, we can create a food delivery system that not only meets our convenience needs but also aligns with our environmental and sustainability goals. This transition requires a collective effort, but the benefits for our planet and future generations make it a journey worth undertaking.

Contact:

Would You like to find out more about our activities, please follow us on Internet and Social Media (Facebook, LInkedIn, X (formerly Twitter)).
Would You like to find out whether there is a possibility to join the project as an associated partner: please fill in the short questionnaire (5 questions) here or contact coordinator for Poland (Dr inż. Andrzej Tonderski) here.

#ChangeKnow #Sustainability #CircularEconomy #GreenGovernance #EcoFriendly #FoodDelivery #MultipleUsePackages

In the quest for sustainability, the public sector plays a crucial role. Through Green Public Procurement (GPP), municipalities and governments can set a powerful example by choosing goods and services that have a reduced environmental impact. However, achieving true sustainability requires more than just a focus on green products; it requires a holistic approach that integrates chemicals, climate, and circularity. This is where the ChemClimCircle project steps in.

What is ChemClimCircle?

ChemClimCircle is an innovative project designed to address the complex interplay between chemicals, climate, and circularity in public procurement processes. The project’s primary aim is to ensure that materials procured by municipalities are not only circular and climate-neutral but also free from harmful toxins. This integrated approach is crucial for creating a truly sustainable and safe circular economy.

The Need for Integration

Public procurement is a powerful tool for driving environmental change. However, traditional procurement practices often overlook the interconnectedness of chemical safety, climate impact, and material circularity. For instance, a product might be climate-neutral but contain harmful chemicals, or it might be free of toxins but contribute to greenhouse gas emissions during its lifecycle.
To address these gaps, ChemClimCircle focuses on developing a comprehensive procurement concept that assesses the interlinks, conflicts, and dependencies between these three critical aspects. By doing so, it aims to provide municipalities with the guidance and tools needed to make informed, sustainable procurement decisions.

Key Components of ChemClimCircle

Concept Development:
• Assessing the interconnections between circularity, chemical risks, and climate neutrality.
• Identifying potential conflicts and dependencies in procurement processes.
Guidance and Training:
• Creating detailed guidance documents and training modules for procurement specialists and decision-makers in municipalities.
• Ensuring these materials are practical and applicable to real-world scenarios.
Internal and External Management Strategies:
• Developing internal strategies for municipalities to coordinate ChemClimCircle aspects.
• Providing external support for municipalities, particularly in the Eastern Baltic Sea Region, through round tables and collaborative efforts.
Stakeholder Engagement:
• Mapping target groups and initiating dialogues with stakeholders.
• Creating platforms for larger collaborative actions and networking opportunities.
International Collaboration:
• Organizing international think tank workshops to discuss findings, share best practices, and receive feedback from a diverse group of experts.

Transforming Public Procurement

ChemClimCircle aims to transform public procurement by embedding the principles of chemicals safety, climate neutrality, and circularity into the procurement processes. This involves:

• Assessing Procurement Processes: Municipalities need to evaluate their current procurement practices to identify areas where improvements can be made in terms of sustainability.
• Developing Comprehensive Criteria: Establishing procurement criteria that ensure products and services are circular, climate-neutral, and free from harmful chemicals.
• Training and Capacity Building: Providing ongoing training for procurement officials to keep them informed about the latest sustainable procurement practices and standards.
• Monitoring and Evaluation: Continuously monitoring procurement outcomes to ensure they align with the ChemClimCircle principles and making adjustments as necessary.

Benefits of Integrated Green Public Procurement

By integrating chemicals, climate, and circularity into public procurement, municipalities can:

• Reduce Environmental Impact: Lower greenhouse gas emissions, decrease waste, and minimize the use of toxic substances.
• Enhance Public Health: Promote the use of non-toxic materials, leading to healthier environments for residents.
• Promote Innovation: Encourage the development and adoption of sustainable products and services.
• Lead by Example: Set a standard for sustainable practices that can inspire other sectors and regions to follow suit.

The Road Ahead

As ChemClimCircle progresses, it aims to create a ripple effect, influencing more municipalities and regions to adopt integrated procurement practices. By addressing the critical links between chemicals, climate, and circularity, the project sets a new standard for sustainable public procurement.
For those involved in public procurement, the ChemClimCircle project offers invaluable insights and practical tools to navigate the complexities of sustainable procurement. By adopting these practices, municipalities can not only reduce their environmental footprint but also lead the way towards a safer, healthier, and more sustainable future.
Stay tuned for more updates on our journey towards integrating chemicals, climate, and circularity in Green Public Procurement. Together, we can make a difference!

For more information about the ChemClimCircle project and how you can get involved (fill in the formular here), visit our website and follow us on social media. Let’s work together for a sustainable future! 🌍🌿🔄

An energy audit constitutes a comprehensive assessment designed to evaluate the energy efficiency of buildings, systems, and operational processes. This analytical process aims to uncover inefficiencies in energy usage and identify opportunities for enhancement and energy conservation. Conducted through a thorough examination, its purpose is to gain a nuanced understanding of energy consumption patterns within a particular structure or process and to devise strategies for optimization.

The principal objectives of conducting an energy audit include:

• Identification of Potential Energy Savings: The audit serves to pinpoint specific areas where energy usage is excessive or inefficient. Common findings may include thermal leaks, improper settings of heating and cooling systems, the use of outdated electrical appliances, or inefficient lighting solutions.
• Enhancement of Energy Efficiency: Insights gained from the audit facilitate the formulation of strategies to optimize energy consumption. This may involve the adoption of more energy-efficient appliances, enhancement of building insulation, fine-tuning of HVAC system operations, or the integration of renewable energy sources.
• Reduction of Operational Costs: By streamlining energy management practices, significant cost savings can be achieved. The audit identifies potential reductions in energy usage that translate directly into decreased utility expenses.
• Promotion of Sustainable Energy Use: The energy audit is a vital instrument in advancing sustainable development goals and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. Enhancements in energy efficiency contribute to reducing the environmental footprint of operations.

Energy audits are conducted by external specialists or experts in energy efficiency, who are fully certified and authorized to undertake such evaluations.

The outcomes of an energy audit offer a detailed overview of current energy consumption levels and provide targeted recommendations for implementing energy efficiency improvements. At Grantera, we maintain a roster of skilled auditors capable of delivering these critical insights.

For further inquiries or to discuss the potential benefits of an energy audit for your organization, please feel free to schedule a complimentary consultation with one of our Energy Efficiency Experts through the form.

We have often received questions about the possibility of obtaining subsidies despite the lack of an idea for innovation or innovative products or technologies . Until recently, we did not have a positive answer to this question, but now the situation has changed. We present you with a solution that perfectly meets these needs – the “Environmental Credit”. POMInnO assissts different organizations in applying for funds and grants.

This program provides an excellent source of financing for the replacement of obsolete machinery with modern ones, modernization of the machinery park and other investments related to energy efficiency. Importantly, it does not require the implementation of innovative products or advanced technologies resulting from research and development. All you have to do is decide to replace energy-intensive machines with new ones that have reduced energy consumption. This is a program aimed at companies that not only want to modernize their machinery, but also want to invest in renewable energy, such as photovoltaics, or make other improvements that will reduce the company’s overall energy consumption.

It is worth noting that, despite its name, the “Environmental Credit” is not a preferential loan, but a non-refundable grant that provides additional financial support to your business.

Therefore, if you are an entrepreneur and believe there are ways to improve energy efficiency in your company – I invite you to individual consultations, which will allow us to determine the chances and likelihood of obtaining a grant for your company. However, before you decide whether this program is for you or not – I warmly invite you to watch a recording from the online training on May 25, 2023, i.e., before the previous edition of this program. The training was conducted by Karol Bober, President of the Grantery Board, who is an expert in the field of EU grants and has over 20 years of experience in obtaining and settling grants. I know that now all companies supporting the acquisition of grants are very busy, and we need to support each other. I share this information without a problem, as the messages conveyed by Karol are always very practical, and I myself sometimes cooperate with Grantera in preparing grant applications, knowing that this knowledge is top-notch.

As part of the Ecological Credit competition, two calls for proposals have been planned for 2024. The first call will last from April 25, 2024, to July 25, 2024. The next call is planned from October 17, 2024, to December 30, 2024.

If you are interested in the program – please fill out the contact form, which will allow us to reach out directly and establish the details of cooperation in preparing the Ecological Credit application for your company.

#environmentalcredit #kredytekologiczny #grantera #serwisgrantowy #grantservice4you

The Challenge: A Green Revolution Awaits

Public procurement is a powerful tool for promoting environmental sustainability, yet its potential remains largely untapped. Despite existing guidelines and criteria, the implementation of Green Public Procurement (GPP) practices is sporadic and voluntary, far from the widespread adoption needed to make a significant environmental impact. The ChemClimCircle project aims to tackle this by integrating chemical safety, circular economy principles, and climate considerations into procurement processes, making green procurement not just an exception, but a norm.

Why Transnational Collaboration Matters

The obstacles to greening public procurement are not confined by borders. Shared challenges across the Baltic Sea Region (BSR), including varying levels of knowledge, lack of skills, and economic pressures, underline the necessity for a unified approach. The ChemClimCircle initiative leverages transnational cooperation to foster knowledge exchange, harmonize standards, and create a unified market that benefits from sustainable procurement practices.

Our Targets: Engaging Key Players

Our focus is on empowering public entities across the BSR, from small municipalities to national authorities, in adopting comprehensive green procurement strategies. This includes procurement and environmental departments, regional development agencies, SMEs, and interest groups, all pivotal in shaping a sustainable future.

The Partnership: A Collective Journey Towards Sustainability

Led by the Lithuanian National Procurement Office, our consortium embodies a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including municipalities, regional networks, think tanks, and the Union of the Baltic Cities. This diverse partnership ensures the development and dissemination of innovative solutions tailored to various contexts across the BSR.

The Roadmap: From Concept to Reality

Our project unfolds in three strategic Work Packages (WPs): Preparing solutions, Piloting and evaluating solutions, and Transferring solutions. Through collaborative efforts, we aim to develop operational models, monitoring concepts, and impact assessment tools that simplify the integration of GPP criteria into procurement practices. This comprehensive approach ensures that our target groups are not only involved but are active participants in the transformation process.

The Outcome: A Sustainable Procurement Ecosystem

The ChemClimCircle initiative is set to revolutionize public procurement by making sustainability the default criterion. Our vision is to create a BSR where every procurement decision is an opportunity to advance environmental goals, fostering a sustainable market that extends beyond regional boundaries.

Join Us: A Call for Action

We invite potential partners to join this ambitious journey to green public procurement across the BSR. Together, we can create a sustainable future, one greener procurement decision at a time. For more info & to get involved, reach out and fill in a short registration form here!

 

In the face of challenges posed by climate change, the European Union is taking further steps towards sustainable development. Tuesday, March 11, 2024, marked a milestone in this process, as the European Parliament voted on significant amendments to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, more widely known as the building directive. The goal of these changes is not only to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions but also to make the EU energetically independent from imported fossil fuels. What specific changes are awaiting us, and how might they impact our daily lives and the construction industry?

Ban on Installing Gas Furnaces

The first, and perhaps most direct, effect of the new regulations is the introduction of a ban on installing fossil fuel-powered furnaces, including natural gas, in new buildings between 2028 and 2030. This ban will be effective in existing buildings from 2040. However, even before this, fossil fuel furnaces can only be installed as supplementary sources, which will force building owners to seek alternative, eco-friendly solutions, such as heat pumps.

Mandatory Installation of Photovoltaic Panels

As part of the effort to maximize the use of renewable energy sources, by 2029, every new residential building will have to be equipped with photovoltaic panels. This step towards reducing CO2 emissions also offers a chance to lower energy bills for residents. These changes will be introduced gradually, starting in 2025 for public buildings and other types of constructions.

Standardization of Energy Performance Certificates

The new regulations also bring changes to energy performance certificates. From now on, all certificates in the EU will have to use a uniform rating scale, which will facilitate the comparison of energy efficiency across different buildings. However, these changes will require administrative adjustments and may be associated with extended issuance periods and a potential increase in their prices.

What Does This Mean for Us?

These changes are seen as a significant step towards a sustainable future and have the potential to bring long-term benefits for both the environment and the economy. However, for homeowners and developers, they mean rethinking construction plans and investing in new technologies.
The construction industry faces the challenge of adapting to new requirements, which could be an opportunity for companies investing in green technologies and offering eco-friendly construction solutions.
For residents of the European Union, these regulations mean adapting and potentially facing challenges in adjusting existing buildings to new standards. On one hand, this is an investment in the future aimed at ensuring a better quality of life and protecting our planet for future generations, but on the other, it poses a significant financial challenge for homeowners and tenants. Residents of Western (wealthier) and Southern (warmer) Europe may find it easier to adapt to these conditions, but for residents of Eastern (poorer) and Northern (colder) Europe, the adjustment could be more challenging. From this perspective, programs like “My Electricity – Mój Prąd” or “Clean Air – Czyste Powietrze” in Poland are essential financial tools that support the direction of these changes.

In Summary

While these decisions are a key element in the EU’s strategy for sustainable development and combating climate change, they present new challenges and opportunities for us, the residents of Europe, as well as the construction sector. Adapting to these changes will require cooperation, innovation, and a willingness to change, awareness, readiness for sacrifices, and the engagement of each of us, but above all, appropriate supporting instruments. This could also be an excellent area for Pan-European project developing solutions and recommendations on how to cope with the complexity of the implementation of building directive.

 

17 maja odbyło się świetne szkolenie internetowe na temat poszukiwania partnerów do konsorcjów projektowych w programach UE (Horyzont Europe) i innych. Szkolenie przeprowadziły panie Agnieszka Murzec Wojnar oraz Monika Gadzińska z Horyzontalnego Punktu Kontaktowego Polska Północna przy Uniwersytecie Warmińsko-Mazurskim w Olsztynie. Skondensowana zawartość tego szkolenia dotyczy praktycznych porad w poszukiwaniu partnerów – czyli co, jak i gdzie?

• Wykorzystaj swoje dotychczasowe kontakty – to najlepsza i najbezpieczniejsza formuła pozyskiwaniu partnerów;
• Nawiązuj nowe kontakty podczas wydarzeń takich jak międzynarodowe konferencje, warsztaty, spotkania brokerskie, dni informacyjne KE. Bądź uczestnikiem a najlepiej prelegentem!
• Wykorzystaj media społecznościowe;
• Zostań ekspertem oceniającym wnioski;
• Dołącz jako partner do projektów w fazie realizacji przy pomocy nowych mechanizmów finasowania kaskadowego (HOP-ON dla Filaru II HE lub EIC Pathfinder);
• Dołącz do projektu jednego z siedmiu Wspólnotowych Centrów Badawczych (Joint Research Center);
• Dołącz jako partner stowarzyszony (Associated Partner);
• Przystąp do któregoś z istniejących europejskich partnerstw w twojej dziedzinie (np. EIT Partnership);
• Skorzystaj z bazy wyszukiwania partnerów (np. Funding & Tendering Opportunities albo Euroaxess).

Chciałbyś dowiedzieć się czegoś więcej na temat któregoś z wymienionych sposobów – zapraszam do kontaktu i konsultacji indywidualnej. 

#horyzonteuropa #serwisgrantowy #partnerstwo #konsorcjumprojektowe